Integrating Universal Design for Learning in Schools: Implications for Teacher Training, Leadership and Professional Development

by Frederic Fovet
Royal Roads University, Canada

https://dx.doi.org/10.46679/isbn978819484832513

Abstract

Universal Design for Learning (UDL) has gained momentum in K-12 education over the last decade. It enables educators to go beyond deficit model approaches to inclusion, and offers sustainable practices for the inclusion of diverse learners through intentional design for instruction and assessment. Promotion of UDL has taken many forms, from provincial projects to school communities of practice. A challenge remains, however, when comes time to widen implementation efforts. There remain specific challenges with regards to the scaling up of implementation strategies across schools and school boards. The process of management of change towards wider UDL buy-in is complex and leads to a necessary questioning of current professional development practices for in-service teachers, and of pre-service teaching in its present format. This chapter will explore these contemporary issues, as well as the wider reflection around leadership that must accompany this process.

Keywords: Universal Design for Learning; Inclusion; K-12 Education, Professional Development; Pre-service Teacher Training; Leadership

This chapter is a part of: Innovations in Educational Leadership and Continuous Teachers’ Professional Development (Eds. Osama Al Mahdi, Ph.D.)

© CSMFL Publications & its authors.

References

  1. Abdullah, A., Ishak, M. Z., Peters, R. F., & Kasan, A. (2019). Classroom Ethnography: Adapt or Adopt? International Journal of Humanities, Philosophy and Language, 2(8), 15-27. https://doi.org/10.35631/ijhpl.28002
  2. Allday, R. A., Neilsen-Gatti, S., & Hudson, T. M. (2013). Preparation for inclusion in teacher education pre-service curricula. Teacher Education and Special Education, 36, 298–311. https://doi.org/10.1177/0888406413497485
  3. Anstead, M. (2016) Teachers Perceptions of Barriers to Universal Design for Learning. EdD Thesis. College of Education, Walden University.
  4. Ashby, C. (2012). Disability studies and inclusive teacher preparation: A socially just path for teacher education. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 37(2), 89-99. https://doi.org/10.1177/154079691203700204
  5. Bacon, K. (2014) How a little idea called Universal Design for Learning has grown to become a big idea — elastic enough to fit every kid. Harvard Ed Magazine. Retrieved from: https://www.gse.harvard.edu/news/ed/14/01/all-along
  6. Bajaj, M. (2018) Conceptualizing Transformative Agency in Education for Peace, Human Rights, and Social Justice. International Journal of Human Rights Education, 2(1).
  7. Bogotch, I., Shields, C. M. (2014). Do promises of social justice trump paradigms of educational leadership?. In Bogotch, I., Shields, C. M. (Eds.), International handbook of educational leadership and social (in)justice (pp. 1–12). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6555-9_1
  8. Baptiste, M. (2019) No Teacher Left Behind: The Impact of Principal Leadership Styles On Teacher Job Satisfaction and Student Success. Journal of International Education and Leadership, 9 (1)
  9. Blackwell, W. H., & Rossetti, Z. S. (2014). The Development of Individualized Education Programs: Where Have We Been and Where Should We Go Now? SAGE Open. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244014530411
  10. Bline, K. (2014) Performing Critical Pedagogy Through Fireside Chats. International Journal of Critical Pedagogy, 5(2)
  11. Bondie, R. S., Dahnke, C., & Zusho, A. (2019). How Does Changing “One-Size-Fits-All” to Differentiated Instruction Affect Teaching? Review of Research in Education, 43(1), 336–362. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X18821130
  12. Bridwell‐Mitchell, E. N. (2016). How peer learning in communities of practice enables and inhibits micro‐institutional change. Organization Studies, 37, 161– 192. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840615593589
  13. Bunbury, S. (2019). Unconscious bias and the medical model: How the social model may hold the key to transformative thinking about disability discrimination. International Journal of Discrimination and the Law, 19 (1), 26-47. https://doi.org/10.1177/1358229118820742
  14. Calder Stegemann, K. J. (2013). Characteristics of teacher candidates who repeat practica and/or withdraw from the B.Ed. Program. Canadian Perspectives Journal, 3, 1–27
  15. Capp, M. (2017) The effectiveness of universal design for learning: a meta-analysis of literature between 2013 and 2016.International Journal of Inclusive Education, 21(8), 791-807. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2017.1325074
  16. CAST. (2015). About universal design for learning. Retrieved from http://www.cast.org/our-work/about-udl.html
  17. Cosier, M. (2016). Professional development in inclusive school reform: The need for critical and functional approaches. In M. Cosier& C. E. Ashby (Eds.), Enacting change from within: Disability studies meets teaching and teacher education (pp. 295–313). New York, NY: Peter Lang Publishing, Inc.
  18. Cosier, M., & Pearson, H. (2016). Can we talk? The underdeveloped dialogue between teacher education and disability studies. SAGE Open, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244015626766
  19. Courtad, C. (2019) Making Your Classroom Smart: Universal Design for Learning and Technology. Smart Education and e-Learning 2019, 501-510. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-8260-4_44
  20. Craig, S., Smith, S.,& Frey, B. (2019) Professional development with universal design for learning: supporting teachers as learners to increase the implementation of UDL.Professional Development in Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2019.1685563
  21. Crispel, O. & Kasperski, R. (2019). The impact of teacher training in special education on the implementation of inclusion in mainstream classrooms. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2019.1600590
  22. Dalton, E. M., Lyner-Cleophas, M., Ferguson, B. T., & McKenzie, J. (2019). Inclusion, universal design and universal design for learning in higher education: South Africa and the United States. African journal of disability, 8, 519. https://doi.org/10.4102/ajod.v8i0.519
  23. de Bruin, K. (2019) The impact of inclusive education reforms on students with disability: an international comparison.International Journal of Inclusive Education, 23(7-8), 811-826. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2019.1623327
  24. DeMatthews, D. E., Kotok, S., & Serafini, A. (2019). Leadership Preparation for Special Education and Inclusive Schools: Beliefs and Recommendations From Successful Principals. Journal of Research on Leadership Education. https://doi.org/10.1177/1942775119838308
  25. Derby, J. (2016). Confronting ableism: Disability studies pedagogy in preservice art education. Studies in Art Education, 57(2), 102-119. https://doi.org/10.1080/00393541.2016.1133191
  26. Eğriboyun, D. (2019). The transactional leadership behaviours, learning organization dimensions and job motivation in the schools. Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, 6(3), 50-82. https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.63.6284
  27. Ellis, G. (2018) Social Model Thinking about Disability through Picturebooks in Primary English. CLELE Journal, article 3. Retrieved from: http://clelejournal.org/article-3-social-model-thinking/
  28. Evmenova, A. (2018) Preparing Teachers to Use Universal Design for Learning to Support Diverse Learners. Journal of Online Learning Research, 4(2), 147-171
  29. Fovet, F. (in print) Developing an Ecological Approach to Strategic UDL Implementation in Higher Education. Journal of Education and Teaching
  30. Fovet, F. (2020) Beyond Novelty – “Innovative” Accessible Teaching as a Return to Fundamental Questions Around Social Justice and Reflective Pedagogy. In: S. Palahicky (Ed.) Enhancing Learning Design for Innovative Teaching in Higher Education. IGI Global: Hershey, PA. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-2943-0.ch002
  31. Fovet, F. (2016) Doing what we preach: examining the contradictions of the UDL discourse in faculties of education. Paper presented at the 2017 AHEAD Ireland Conference, Dublin, March
  32. Freedman, J., Applebaum, A., Woodfield, C., & Ashby, C. (2019) Integrating Disability Studies Pedagogy in Teacher Education. Journal of Teaching Disability Studies, 1.
  33. Friesen, (2018, September 18) A Future Wanting to Emerge. EdCan. Retrieved from: https://www.edcan.ca/articles/a-future-wanting-to-emerge/
  34. Gaikhorst, L., März, V., du Pré, R., & Geijsel, F. (2019) Workplace conditions for successful teacher professional development: School principals’ beliefs and practices. European Journal of Education, 54, 605– 620. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12366
  35. Garsten, C., & Nyqvist, A. (Eds.) (2013)Organisational anthropology: doing ethnography in and among complex organisations. New York: Pluto Press.
  36. Gilham, C. M., & Tompkins, J. (2016). Inclusion reconceptualized: Pre-service teacher education and disability studies in education. Canadian Journal of Education, 39(4)
  37. Gillberg, C., & Pettersson, A. (2019) Between duty and right: disabled schoolchildren and teachers’ ableist manifestations in Sweden. Disability & Society, 34(9-10), 1668-1673. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2019.1630592
  38. Goodwin, A.L. (2020) Globalization, Global Mindsets and Teacher Education. Action in Teacher Education, 42(1), 6-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/01626620.2019.1700848
  39. Hallam, P. R., Smith, H. R., Hite, J. M., Hite, S. J., & Wilcox, B. R. (2015). Trust and Collaboration in PLC Teams: Teacher relationship, principal support, and collaborative benefits. NASSP Bulletin, 99(3), 193–216. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192636515602330
  40. Heroux, J. R. (2017). Infusing disability studies within special education: A personal story. Review of Disability Studies: An International Journal, 13(1).
  41. Hjörne, E., & Säljö, R. (2019) Teaching and learning in the special education setting: agency of the diagnosed child. Emotional and Behavioural Difficulties, 24(3), 224-238. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632752.2019.1609239
  42. Hogan, A. (2019) Social and medical models of disability and mental health: evolution and renewal. CMAJ, 191(1) E16-E18. https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.181008
  43. Hogle, P. (2019, March 20) Improve UX with Accessible, Inclusive eLearning Design. Learning Solutions. Retrieved from: https://learningsolutionsmag.com/articles/improve-ux-with-accessible-inclusive-elearning-design
  44. Institute for Human Centered Design. (2017). History of universal design. Boston, MA: IHCD. Retrieved from: https://web.archive.org/web/20170929034659/http://www.humancentereddesign.org/universal-design/history-universal-design
  45. Israel, M., Ribuffo, C., & Smith, S. (2014). Innovation Configuration Universal Design for Learning Recommendations for Teacher Preparation and Professional Development. Office of Special Education Programs, U.S. Department of Education, (Ic), 1–38.
  46. Juvonen, J., Lessard, L., Rastogi, R., Schacter, H., &S ayre Smith, D. (2019) Promoting Social Inclusion in Educational Settings: Challenges and Opportunities. Educational Psychologist, 54(4), 250-270. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2019.1655645
  47. Kars, M., & Inandi, Y. (2018). Relationship between school principals’ leadership behaviors and teachers’ organizational trust. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 74, 145-164. https://doi.org/10.14689/ejer.2018.74.8
  48. Keay, J., Carse, N., & Jess, M. (2019) Understanding teachers as complex professional learners. Professional Development in Education, 45(1), 125-137. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2018.1449004
  49. Kelly, J. (2013). Professional learning communities: The emergence of vulnerability.Professional Development in Education, 39(5), 862-864. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2012.753932
  50. Kelly, J., & Cherkowski, S. (2015). Collaboration, collegiality, and collective reflection: A case study of professional development for teachers. Canadian Journal of Educational Administration and Policy, 169, 1-27.
  51. Keon, D. M. (2020). ‘Soft barriers’ – The impact of school ethos and culture on the inclusion of students with special educational needs in mainstream schools in Ireland. Improving Schools. https://doi.org/10.1177/1365480219898897
  52. Kirby, M. (2017) Implicit Assumptions in Special Education Policy: Promoting Full Inclusion for Students with Learning Disabilities. Child Youth Care Forum, 46,175–191. Retrieved from: https://teachingisintellectual.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/Kirby-2016.pdf. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10566-016-9382-x
  53. Kocaballi, A., Laranjo, L., & Coiera, E., (2019) Understanding and Measuring User Experience in Conversational Interfaces. Interacting with Computers, 31(2), 192–207. https://doi.org/10.1093/iwc/iwz015
  54. Kulkarni, S. S. (2019). Towards a critical disability studies model of teacher education. In K. Ellis, R. Garland-Thomson, M. Kent, & R. Robertson (Eds.). Interdisciplinary approaches to disability: Looking towards the future (Vol. 2). Abingdon-on-Thames, UK: Routledge.
  55. Kumari, A.M., & Mishra, A. (2017) Universal design for education in regular schools: a preliminary study. International Journal of Development Research, 7, art. 9743. Retrieved from: https://www.journalijdr.com/universal-design-education-regular-schools-preliminary-study
  56. Lambrecht, J., Lenkeit, J., Hartmann, A., Ehlert, A., Knigge, M., & Spörer, N. (2020) The effect of school leadership on implementing inclusive education: how transformational and instructional leadership practices affect individualised education planning. International Journal of Inclusive Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2020.1752825
  57. Lautenbach, F., & Heyder, A. (2019) Changing attitudes to inclusion in preservice teacher education: a systematic review.Educational Research, 61(2), 231-253. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131881.2019.1596035
  58. Louws, M. L., Meirink, J. A., van Veen, K., & van Driel, J. H. (2017). Exploring the relation between teachers’ perceptions of workplace conditions and their professional learning goals. Professional Development in Education, 43, 770– 788. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2016.1251486
  59. Lowrey, K., Classen, A., & Sylvest, A. (2019). Exploring Ways to Support Preservice Teachers’ Use of UDL In Planning and Instruction. Journal of Educational Research & Practice, 9(1), 261-281. https://doi.org/10.5590/JERAP.2019.09.1.19
  60. Maciver, D., Rutherford, M., Arakelyan, S., Kramer, J. M., Richmond, J., Todorova, L., Romero-Ayuso, D., Nakamura-Thomas, H., Ten Velden, M., Finlayson, I., O’Hare, A., & Forsyth, K. (2019). Participation of children with disabilities in school: A realist systematic review of psychosocial and environmental factors. PloS one, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0210511
  61. Mader, J. (2017, March 1) How Teacher Training Hinders Special-Needs Students. The Atlantic. Retrieved from: https://www.theatlantic.com/education/archive/2017/03/how-teacher-training-hinders-special-needs-students/518286/
  62. Manrique, A.L., Dirani, E., Frere, A., Moreira, G., & Arezes, P. (2018). Teachers’ perceptions on inclusion in basic school. International Journal of Educational Management, 33. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-02-2018-0058
  63. Martin, N., Wray, M., James, A., Draffan, E.A., Krupa, J., & Turner, P. (2019). Implementing Inclusive Teaching and Learning in UK Higher Education – Utilising Universal Design for Learning (UDL) as a Route to Excellence. Society for Research into Higher Education
  64. McConnell, T. J., Parker, J. M., Koehler, M. J., & Lundenberg, M. A. (2013). Virtual professional learning communities: Teachers perceptions of virtual versus face-to face professional development. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 22(3), 267-277. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-012-9391-y
  65. Menconi, M.E, & Grohmann, D. (2018) Participatory retrofitting of school playgrounds: Collaboration between children and university students to develop a vision. Thinking Skills and Creativity,29,71-86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2018.06.006
  66. Meyer, A., Rose, D., & Gordon, D. (2014). Universal design for learning: Theory and practice. Wakefield, MA: CAST Professional Publishing.
  67. Murphy, A. (2017, October 26) Embracing the UDL Classroom: 4 Steps To A More Flexible Education. EdTech. Retrieved from: https://edtechmagazine.com/k12/article/2017/10/4-steps-implement-universal-design-learning-classroom
  68. Nation, M., Christens, B., Bess, K., Shinn, M., Perkins, D., & Speer, P. (2020) Addressing the problems of urban education: An ecological systems perspective.Journal of Urban Affairs. https://doi.org/10.1080/07352166.2019.1705847
  69. National Council on Disability (2018) The Segregation of Students with Disabilities. IDEA Series. NCD: Washington DC. Retrieved from: https://ncd.gov/sites/default/files/NCD_Segregation-SWD_508.pdf
  70. Ok, M., Rao, K., Bryant, B., & McDougall, D. (2017)Universal Design for Learning in Pre-K to Grade 12 Classrooms: A Systematic Review of Research. Exceptionality, 25(2), 116-138. https://doi.org/10.1080/09362835.2016.1196450
  71. Oliver, M. (2013) The Social Model of Disability: Thirty Years on.Disability & Society, 28(7), 1024–1026. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2013.818773
  72. Owen, S. (2014).Teacher professional learning communities: Going beyond contrived collegiality toward challenging debate and collegial learning and professional growth. Australian Journal of Adult Learning, 54(2), 54
  73. Pearson, H. (2016) The impact of Disability Studies curriculum on education professionals’ perspectives and practice: Implications for education, social justice, and social change. Disability Studies Quarterly, 36(2). https://doi.org/10.18061/dsq.v36i2.4406
  74. Pozas, M., Letzel, V., & Schneider, C. (2020) Teachers and differentiated instruction: exploring differentiation practices to address student diversity. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-3802.12481
  75. Ralabate, P. (2011) Universal Design for Learning: Meeting the Needs of All Students. Leader, 16(10), 14-17. https://doi.org/10.1044/leader.FTR2.16102011.14
  76. Rao, K., &Meo, G. (2016). Using Universal Design for Learning to Design Standards-Based Lessons. SAGE Open. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244016680688
  77. Rashid, M., Caine, V., &Goez, H. (2015) The Encounters and Challenges of Ethnography As Methodology in Health Research.International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 14, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406915621421
  78. Rees, K. (2017). Models of disability and the categorisation of children with severe and profound learning difficulties: Informing educational approaches based on an understanding of individual needs. Educational and Child Psychology, 34, 30-39
  79. Rodd, P., & Sanders, K. (2019). The imperative of critical pedagogy in times of cultural austerity: A case study of the capacity to reimagine education as a tool for emancipation. New Zealand Sociology, 33,33-55. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429019166-4
  80. Roswitha, R., Antje, W., Gertrud, L., &Philipp, K. (2019) Pre-service Teachers’ Beliefs About Inclusive Education Before and After Multi-Compared to Mono-professional Co-teaching: An Exploratory Study. Frontiers in Education, 4, 101. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2019.00101
  81. Shah, N. (2012). Study finds districts buying into universal design: But many education leaders still aren’t sure what UDL is. Education Week, 31(32)
  82. Smale-Jacobse, A., Meijer, A., Helms-Lorenz, M., Maulana, R. (2019) Differentiated Instruction in Secondary Education: A Systematic Review of Research Evidence. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 2366. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02366
  83. Smith, P., & Bell, L. (2011). Transactional and transformational leadership in schools in challenging circumstances: a policy paradox. Management in Education, 25(2), 58–61. https://doi.org/10.1177/0892020611399608
  84. Smith, S. J., Rao, K., Lowrey, K. A., Gardner, J. E., Moore, E., Coy, K., Marino, M., &Wojcik, B. (2019). Recommendations for a National Research Agenda in UDL: Outcomes From the UDL-IRN Preconference on Research. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 30(3), 174–185. https://doi.org/10.1177/1044207319826219
  85. Song, H. (2012). The role of teachers’ professional learning communities in the context of curriculum reform in high schools. Chinese Education & Society, 45(4), 81-95. https://doi.org/10.2753/CED1061-1932450406
  86. Stanford, B., & Reeves, S. (2009). Making It Happen: Using Differentiated Instruction, Retrofit Framework and Universal Design for Learning. TEACHING Exceptional Children / TEACHING Exceptional Children Plus.
  87. Sulaimani, M., & Gut, D. (2019) Hidden Curriculum in a Special Education Context: The Case of individuals With Autism. Journal of Educational Research and Practice, 9(1), 30–39. https://doi.org/10.5590/JERAP.2019.09.1.03
  88. Svensson, I., Nordström, T., Lindeblad, E., Gustafson, S., Björn, M., Sand, C., Almgren-Bäck, G., & Nilsson, S. (2019) Effects of assistive technology for students with reading and writing disabilities.Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology. https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2019.1646821
  89. Swaffield, S.,& Major, L. (2019) Inclusive educational leadership to establish a co-operative school cluster trust? Exploring perspectives and making links with leadership for learning. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 23(11), 1149-1163. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2019.1629164
  90. Tobia, E. F., & Hord, S. M. (2012). I am a professional: Learning communities elevate teachers’ knowledge, skills, and identity. Journal of Staff Development, 33(3), 16-26
  91. Third Pan-Canadian Conference on UDL (2019) Connecting the Dots – Sharing Promising Practices across Country. Retrieved from: www.udlcanada.ca
  92. Trent, J. (2019) Building Access: Universal Design and the Politics of Disability.Journal of American History, 105(4), 1042–1043. https://doi.org/10.1093/jahist/jaz090
  93. Valle, J. W., & Connor, D. J. (2011). Rethinking disability: A disability studies approach to inclusive practices. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill
  94. Van Boxtel, J.,& Sugita, T. (2019) Exploring the implementation of lesson-level UDL principles through an observation protocol.International Journal of Inclusive Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2019.1655596
  95. Van Diggelen, M.R., Doulougeri, K.I., Gomez-Puente, S.M., Bombaerts, G., Dirkx, K., & Kamp, R.(2019)Coaching in design-based learning: a grounded theory approach to create a theoretical model and practical propositions. International Journal of Technology and Design Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-019-09549-x
  96. Van Geel, M., Keuning, T., Frèrejean, J., Dolmans, D., van Merriënboer, J., &Visscher, A. (2019) Capturing the complexity of differentiated instruction.School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 30(1), 51-67. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2018.1539013
  97. Van Lankveld, T., Schoonenboom, J., Volman, M., Croiset, G., &Beishuizen, J. (2017). Developing a teacher identity in the university context: A systematic review of the literature. Higher Education Research & Development,36(2), 325–342. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2016.1208154
  98. Van Veen, K., Zwart, R., &Meirink, J. (2012). What makes teacher professional development effective? A literature review. In M. Kooy& K. van Veen (Eds.), Teacher learning that matters: International perspectives (pp. 3– 21). New York, NY: Routledge.
  99. Vitelli, E. M. (2015). Universal design for learning: Are we teaching it to pre-service general education teachers? Journal of Special Education Technology, 30, 166–178. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162643415618931
  100. Wang, S. (2019) School heads’ transformational leadership and students’ modernity: the multiple mediating effects of school climates. Asia Pacific Educational Review, 20, 329–341. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-019-09575-3
  101. Williams, V., Tarleton, B., Heslop, P., Porter, S., Sass, B., Blue, S., Merchant, W., &Mason-Angelow, V. (2018) Understanding disabling barriers: a fruitful partnership between Disability Studies and social practices? Disability & Society, 33(2), 157-174. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2017.1401527
  102. Witterholt, M., Goedhart, M., & Suhre, C. (2016). The impact of peer collaboration on Teachers´ practical knowledge. European Journal of Teacher Education, 39(1), 126–143. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2015.1109624
  103. Yngve, M., Lidström, H., Ekbladh, E., &Hemmingsson, H. (2019) Which students need accommodations the most, and to what extent are their needs met by regular upper secondary school? A cross-sectional study among students with special educational needs.European Journal of Special Needs Education, 34(3), 327-341. https://doi.org/10.1080/08856257.2018.1501966
  104. You, S., Kim, E., & Shin, K. (2019) Teachers’ Belief and Efficacy Toward InclusiveEducation in Early Childhood Settings in Korea. Sustainability, 11, 1489. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11051489

[email protected]

Follow us @