Realising the Vision of Technology Integration: A Case Study of K-12 Private Schools in the United Arab Emirates

by Kheder Mahmoud 1, Catherine Arden 2, Jennifer Donovan 3
1Doctoral Candidate, Doctor of Education, University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, Queensland, Australia.
2Senior Lecturer in Adult and Vocational Education, School of Education, University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, Queensland, Australia.
3Lecturer (Education), School of Education, University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, Queensland, Australia.


Heralded by the release of government policies such as Vision 2021, the United Arab Emirates (UAE) has joined the worldwide impetus for the integration of Information Communications Technologies (ICTs) into its K-12 education system as a central plank of reforms to its economy and education system. This presents challenges for schools in both public and private sectors in the UAE as they strive to adhere to national government and local education authority guidelines and standards for educational innovation. Whilst the UAE Government has invested heavily to support technology integration in public schools, private schools must fund their own technology integration initiatives. In a context of strong growth in the private K-12 sector and reported high teacher turnover rates, private school leadership faces particular challenges related to decision-making about investment in suitable technologies and support systems, including teachers’ professional development. This chapter reports some preliminary findings from a qualitative case study investigating the teacher, school and system-wide factors impacting on technology integration in selected private schools located in four Emirates. The study combines policy analysis with semi-structured interviews of a purposive sample of private school K-12 educators to yield a detailed understanding of the challenges faced by private sector UAE schools in implementing technology integration in response to national government policy directives. The findings will inform the development of an implementation framework providing guidance regarding critical success factors for effective technology integration in private schools with particular implications for school leadership and teachers’ professional learning.

Keywords: Educational change, ICT, innovation, national education policy, private schools, professional development, teachers, technology, technology integration, UAE

Source Title: Innovations in Educational Leadership and Continuous Teachers’ Professional Development (Eds. Osama Al Mahdi, Ph.D.)

© CSMFL Publications & its authors.


  1. Abu Dhabi Education Council’s e-Learning initiative. (2013). In ADEC. Retrieved from
  2. AdvancEd. (2017). AdvancEd performance standards for school systems. Retrieved from
  3. AdvancEd. (2018). AdvancED policies and procedures for accreditation and certification. Retrieved from
  4. Alkhyeli, H., & Van Ewijk, A. (2018). Prioritisation of factors influencing teachers’ job satisfaction in the UAE. International Journal of Management in Education12(1), 1-24, ISSN: 1750385X; 17503868.
  5. Almekhlafi, A. G., & Almeqdadi, F. A. (2010). Teachers’ perceptions of technology integration in the United Arab Emirates school classrooms. Educational Technology & Society, 13 (1), 165–175
  6. Alsharief, T. (2018). Pre-service teachers’ perceptions of the barriers to ICT ‎integration in their future instructional practice in a Gulf State. (Doctoral dissertation, University of Liverpool, United Kingdom). Retrieved from:
  7. Andersson, S. B. (2006). Newly qualified teachers’ learning related to their use of information and communication technology: A Swedish perspective. British Journal of Educational Technology, 37(5), 665-682.
  8. Angélli Genlott, A., Grönlund, Å., & Viberg, O. (2019). Disseminating digital innovation in school―leading second order educational change. Education and Information Technologies.
  9. Archambault, L., & Crippen, K. (2009). Examining TPACK among K-12 online distance educators in the United States. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1), 71-88.
  10. Atl, M., & Guessoum, N. (2010). eLearning in United Arab Emirates. In U. Demiray (Ed), E-Learning Practices. Turkey: Anadolu University.
  11. Beidas-Strom, S., Rasmussen, T. N.,& Robinson, D. O. (2011). Gulf Cooperation Council Countries (GCC): Enhancing economic outcomes in an uncertain global economy. Retrieved from
  12. Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27-40. doi:10.3316/QRJ0902027.
  13. Bradshaw, P., Twining, P., & Walsh, C. (2012). The vital program: Transforming ICT professional development. American Journal of Distance Education, 26(2), 74–85.
  14. Braun V, &Clarke, V.(2006).Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Journal of Research in Psychology 3, pp.77–101.
  15. Buabeng-Andoh, C. (2012). Factors influencing teachers’ adoption and integration of information and communication technology into teaching: A review of the literature. International Journal of Education and Development using Information and Communication Technology (IJEDICT),(8)1, pp. 136-155
  16. Clark, N. (2014). The major international school curriculums. World Education News and Reviews. Retrieved from
  17. Davis, H., Hartshorne, P., & Ring, G. (2010). Being an innovative teacher: Preservice teachers’ conceptions of technology and innovation. International Journal of Education 2(1), 1-28.
  18. Dawson, K. (2006). Teacher inquiry: A vehicle to merge prospective teachers’ experience and reflection during curriculum-based, technology-enhanced field experiences. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 38(3), 265-292.
  19. Department for Education. (2016). Standards for British schools overseas. Retrieved from
  20. DiPietro, M., Ferdig, R.E., Preston, M., & Black, E.W. (2008). Best practices in teaching K-12 online: Lessons learned from Michigan Virtual School teachers. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 7(1), 10-35.
  21. Educational Profession Licensure. (2018). Teaching licensing system. United Arab Emirates Ministry of Education. Retrieved from:!/about.
  22. Eom, S. B., & Wen, H. J. (2006). The determinants of students’ perceived learning outcomes and satisfaction in university online education: An empirical investigation. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 4(2), 215-235.
  23. Erstad, O., Eickelmann, B., & Eichhorn, K. (2015). Preparing teachers for schooling in the digital age: A meta-perspective on existing strategies and future challenges. Education and Information Technology, 20(4),641-654.
  24. Gao, P., Choy, D., Wong, A. F., & Wu, J. (2009). Developing a better understanding of technology-based pedagogy. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 25(5), 714-730.
  25. Garrison, R. (2003). Cognitive presence for effective asynchronous online learning: The role of reflective inquiry, self-direction and metacognition. Retrieved from
  26. General Assembly (2015). Transforming our world: the 2030 agenda for sustainable development report no. A/RES/70/1. United Nations.
  27. Ghavifekr, S., Kunjappan, T., Ramasamy, L., & Anthony, A. (2016). Teaching and learning with ICT tools: Issues and challenges from teachers´ perceptions. Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Technology, 4(2), 38-57development report no. A/RES/70/1. United Nations.
  28. Gil-Flores, J., Rodríguez-Santero, J., & Torres-Gordillo, J.-J. (2017). Factors that explain the use if ICT in secondary-education classrooms: The role of teacher characteristics and school infrastructure. Computers in Human Behavior, 68, 441-449.
  29. Godwin, S. (2006). Globalization, education and emiratisation: A study of the United Arab Emirates. The Electronic Journal on Information Systems in Developing Countries EJISDC27(1), pp. 1-14
  30. Goodwin, A. L., Low, E. L., Ng, P. T., Yeung, A. S., & Cai, L. (2015). Enhancing playful teachers´ perceptionof ICT use in the classroom: The role of risk taking as a mediator. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 40(4), 132-149.
  31. Gray, D. E. (2014). Doing research in the real world. London: SAGE
  32. Hew, K. F., & Brush, T. (2007). Integrating technology into K-12 teaching and learning: Current knowledge gaps and recommendations for future research. Educational Technology Research and Development, 55(3), 223-252.
  33. Höckel, K. (2015). Better skills, better jobs, better lives: A strategic approach to skills policies for the United Arab Emirates. OCED
  34. Hoffman, B. (2006). When means become ends: Technology producing values. Media, Technology and Lifelong Learning, 2(2), 1-12. Retrieved from
  35. Horn, M., & Staker, H. (2011). The rise of K–12 blended learning. Mountain View CA.: Innosight Institute.
  36. Hvidt, M. (2013). Kuwait programme on development, governance and globalisation in the Gulf States: Economic diversification in GCC countries: Past record and future trends. Retrieved from The London School of Economics and Political Science:
  37. Jigsaw Consult. (2016). MBRSLP research report 2015 – 2016. London: Author.
  38. Kamal, K., & Trines, S. (2018, August 10). Education in the United Arab Emirates. Education system profiles. Retrieved from:
  39. Kay, R. H., & Knaack, L. (2005). A case for ubiquitous, integrated computing in teacher education. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 14(3), 391-412.
  40. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. (2016). Vision 2030 Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia: Author.
  41. Kozma, R. B. (2003a). ICT and education: A global phenomenon. In R. B. Kozma (Ed.). Technology, innovation, and educational change: A global perspective. Eugene, OR: International Society for Technology in Education (pp. 1-18).
  42. Kozma, R. B. (2003b). Technology and classroom practices: An international study. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 36(1), 1-14.
  43. Kozma, R. B. (Ed.). (2003c). Technology, innovation, and educational change: A global perspective. Eugene, OR: International Society for Technology in Education.
  44. Kuwait. (2017). New Kuwait 2035 Kuwait national development plan. Kuwait: Author.
  45. Maceda, C. (2017, July 3). UAE school fees ‘second highest in the world’: HSBC study. Retrieved from
  46. Mohebi, L. (2019). Leaders´ perception of ICT integration in private schools: An exploratory study from Dubai (UAE).Social Science Research Network, Elsevier. Retrieved from
  47. National Qualifications Authority. (2015). Teacher standards for the UAE. United Arab Emirates. Retrieved from!/downloads-v2.
  48. New England Association of Schools and Colleges. (2019). Accreditation handbook 2019. Retrieved from
  49. OECD. (2018). Trends shaping education 2018 spotlight 15: A brave new world. Retrieved from [].
  50. OECD (2019).TALIS 2018 Results (Volume I): Teachers and School Leaders as Lifelong Learners. OECD Publishing. doi: 10.1787/1d0bc92a-en.
  51. OECD. (2019). Countries must make teaching profession more financially and intellectually attractive. Retrieved from
  52. Owen, G. T. (2014). Qualitative methods in higher education policy analysis: Using interviews and document Analysis.The Qualitative Report, 19(26), 1-19. Retrieved from
  53. PISA. (2019). PISA 2021 ICT Framework. OCED
  54. Pricewaterhouse Coopers [PwC]. (2016, August 17). Understanding the GCC education Sector: A country by country guide. Retrieved from
  55. Private Schools in the UAE. (2017, March 7). Retrieved from
  56. Ridge, N. Y., Shami, S., & Kippels, S. M. (2016). Private education in the absence of a public option: The cases of the United Arab Emirates and Qatar. FIRE: Forum for International Research in Education, 3(2),pp. 41-59. Retrieved from
  57. Selwyn, N. (2014). Distrusting educational technology: Critical questions for changing times. New York: Routledge.
  58. Stake, R. E. (2003). Case studies. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Strategies of qualitative inquiry (2nd ed.). London: SAGE.
  59. Stake, R. E. (2005). Qualitative case studies. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (p. 443–466). London: SAGE
  60. Sustainable Development Goals. (2017). From goals to reality: UAE and the 2030 agenda for sustainable development. The UAE portal for the Sustainable Development Goals. Retrieved from
  61. Swain, C. (2006). Preservice teachers’ self-assessment using technology: Determining what is worthwhile and looking for changes in daily teaching and learning practices. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 14(1), 29-59
  62. Tamim, R., Borokhovski, E., Pickup, D., & Bernard, R. (2015). Large-scale, government-supported educational tablet initiatives. Commonwealth of Learning. doi: 10.13140/RG.2.1.2359.7849
  63. Tondeur, J., Braak, J.V., Ertmer, P. A., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. (2016). Understanding the relationship between teachers’ pedagogical beliefs and technology use in education: A systematic review of qualitative evidence. Education Technology Research and Development65, pp. 555–57.
  64. Twining, P., Raffaghelli, J., Albion, P., & Knezek, D. (2013). Moving education into the digital age: The contribution of teachers’ professional development. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 29(5), 426-437.
  65. Ulrichsen, K. C. (2016).The Gulf States in international political economy.
  66. United Arab Emirates Ministry of Education. (2020). Education 2020 Strategy. The UAE portal for the Sustainable Development Goals. Retrieved from
  67. United Arab Emirates Ministry of Education. (2020). Ministry of Education strategic plan 2017-2021. (2020, October). Retrieved from
  68. United Arab Emirates. (2010). UAEvision 2021. UAE: Author.
  69. UNESCO. (2020). The futures of education after COVID-19 regional dialogue synthesis report. Retrieved from
  70. Webb, C. (2019). The innovation imperative: Adding fire to the fuel of genius in UAE schools? Paper presented to the Future of Education International Conference. Retrieved from
  71. Wright, V. H. & Wilson, E. K. (2005). From preservice to in-service teaching: A study of technology integration. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 22(2), 49-55

[email protected]

Follow us @