Community, Connections and Innovation in Emergency Remote Teaching and Learning

by Sandra Healy
Kyoto Institute of Technology, Japan.


Healy, S. (2021). Community, Connections and Innovation in Emergency Remote Teaching and Learning. In D. Koyama (Ed.), Development of Innovative Pedagogical Practices for a Modern Learning Experience (pp 141-168). Jagadhri, HR: CSMFL Publications.


The emergence of the Covid-19 virus had an enormous impact on all of our lives and significantly affected the lives of first-year university students in Japan who began their tertiary education during the initial lockdown. This chapter examines the impact the move online had on these students by analysing videos created by them as part of their academic English as a Foreign Language (EFL) coursework. The videos were analysed, and 12 themes emerged which were used as a foundation for new practices focusing on the development of community and connections in online courses, particularly the use of e-mentors.

Keywords: Online learning, emergency remote teaching and learning, digital inclusion, e-mentors, video analysis

This is a part of: Development of Innovative Pedagogical Practices for a Modern Learning Experience (Eds. Dennis Koyama, Ph.D.)

© CSMFL Publications & its authors.


  1. Atkinson, D. (2010). Extended, embodied cognition and second language acquisition. Applied Linguistics, 31(5), 599-622.
  2. Bettinger, E. P., & Baker, R. B. (2014). The effects of student coaching: An evaluation of a randomized experiment in student advising. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 36(1), 3-19.
  3. Bax, S. (2011). Normalisation revisited: The effective use of technology in language education. International Journal of Computer-Assisted Language Learning and Teaching, 1(2), 1–15.
  4. Buchwald, D., Schantz-Laursen, B., & Delmar, C. (2009). Video diary data collection in research with children: An alternative method. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 8(1), 12–20.
  5. Cooley, S. J., Holland, M. J., Cumming, J., Novakovic, E. G., & Burns, V. E. (2014). Introducing the use of a semi-structured video diary room to investigate students’ learning experiences during an outdoor adventure education groupwork skills course. Higher Education, 67(1), 105–121.
  6. Dell, C. A., Dell, T. F., & Blackwell, T. L. (2015). Applying universal design for learning in online courses: Pedagogical and practical considerations. Journal of Educators Online, 12(2), 166-192.
  7. Dewaele, J. M. (2019). When elephants fly: The lift-off of emotion research in applied linguistics. The Modern Language Journal, 103(2), 533-536.
  8. Dewaele, J. M., & Li, C. (2020). Emotions in second language acquisition: A critical review and research agenda. Foreign Language World,196(1), 34-49.
  9. Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and education. Kappa Delta Pi.
  10. Dolan, E., and Johnson, D. (2009). Toward a holistic view of holistic undergraduate research experiences: An exploratory study of impact on graduate/postdoctoral mentors. Journal of Science Education Technology, 2009(18), 487–500.
  11. Dörnyei, Z. (2005). The psychology of the language learner: Individual differences in second language acquisition. Mahwah.
  12. Dörnyei, Z. (2014). Future self-guides and vision. The impact of self-concept on language learning, 7-18.
  13. Drake, J. K. (2011). The role of academic advising in student retention and persistence. About Campus, 16(3), 8-12.
  14. Duffin, E. (2020). E-learning and digital education – Statistics & facts.
  15. Eby, L. T., & Dolan, E. L. (2015). Mentoring in postsecondary education and organizational settings. In P. J. Hartung, M. L. Savickas & W. B. Walsh (Eds.), APA handbooks in psychology. APA handbook of career intervention, Vol. 2. Applications, 383–395). American Psychological Association.
  16. Glaser, B.G., & Strauss, A.L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Aldine deGruyter.
  17. Hadfield, J., & Dörnyei, Z. (2014). Motivating learning. Routledge.
  18. Hamburg, I. (2020). Creating innovative structures in workplace and vocational digital learning to ensure social distancing. In ICDS 2020: The Fourteenth International Conference on Digital Society,124-127.
  19. Hart, C. M., Friedmann, E., & Hill, M. (2018). Online course-taking and student outcomes in California community colleges. Education Finance and Policy,13(1), 42-71.
  20. Healy, S. (2021). COVID-19 pandemic-influenced changes to Japanese university student digital identity. In P. Clements, R. Derrah & P. Ferguson (Eds.), Communities of teachers and learners. JALT.
  21. Hoare, E., Bott, D., & Robinson, J. (2017). Learn it, live it, teach it, embed it: Implementing a whole school approach to foster positive mental health and wellbeing through positive education. International Journal of Wellbeing, 7(3), 56-71.
  22. Hodges, C., Moore, S., Lockee, B., Trust, T., & Bond, A. (2020). The difference between emergency remote teaching and online learning. Educause Review, 27, 1-12.
  23. Honda, H., Yoshikawa, K., Yamashina, Y., Yamato, Y., Terada, S., & Goto, M. (2020). Association among social-networking service usage via smartphone, internet addiction, and psychological stress in Japanese physical therapy university students: a single-university cross-sectional study. Journal of Physical Therapy Science, 32(9), 591–596.
  24. Ito, M., Baumer, S., Bittanti, M., Boyd, D., Cody, R., Herr-Stephenson, B., Horst, H.A., … & Tripp, L. (2010). Hanging out, messing around, and geeking out. MIT Press.
  25. Kwan, C., Gitimoghaddam, M., & Collet, J. P. (2020). Effects of social isolation and loneliness in children with neurodevelopmental disabilities: A scoping review. Brain Sciences, 10(11), 786.
  26. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press.
  27. Lo, Y. F. (2010). Implementing reflective portfolios for promoting autonomous learning among EFL college students in Taiwan. Language Teaching Research, 14(1), 77-95.
  28. McCosker, A., Suchowerska, R., & Wilson, C. (2019) Digital mentors: The heart of the digital revolution. Swinburne university of Technology.
  29. Meesong, K., & Jaroongkhongdach, W. (2016). Autonomous language learning: Thai undergraduate students’ behaviors. Thai TESOL Journal, 29(2), 156-186.
  30. Mehran, P., Alizadeh, M., Koguchi, I., & Takemura, H. (2017). Are Japanese digital natives ready for learning English online? A preliminary case study at Osaka University. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education,14(1), 1-17.
  32. Meschitti, V., & Lawton-Smith, H. (2017). Does mentoring make a difference for women academics? Evidence from the literature and a guide for future research. Journal of Research in Gender Studies, 7(1), 166-199.
  33. MEXT. (2020). A report on the status of classes implementation at Japanese universities due to the novella coronavirus.
  34. Nakamura, M. (2017). The state of distance education in Japan. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 18(3), 75-87.
  35. National Institute for Educational Policy Research (NIER). Programme for International Student Assessment information.
  36. Nguyen, T. (2015). The effectiveness of online learning: Beyond no significant difference and future horizons. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching,11(2): 309–310.
  37. Okuda, Y. (2019). Daigakusei no keitai to pasokon no riyoujoukyou [Smartphone or PC: IT gadget usage among university students].Bulletin of Faculty of Management Fukuyama Heisei University,15, 145-155.
  38. Ono, Y., & Shouji, K. (2015). Bukatsudouniokeru Senpai Kouhai Kankei no Kenkyu [Research about senior-junior relationships at club activities]. The Annual Report of Educational Psychology in Japan, 63, 438-452.
  39. Otani T. (2007). “SCAT” A qualitative analysis method by four-step coding: Easy startable and small scale data applicable process of theorization. Bulletin of the Graduate School of Education and Human Development (Educational Sciences), Nagoya University, 54(2), 27-44.
  40. Pavlenko, A. (2013). The affective turn in SLA: From ‘affective factors’ to ‘language desire’ and ‘commodification of affect’. The Affective Dimension in Second Language Acquisition,3-28.
  41. Prior, M. T. (2019). Elephants in the room: An “affective turn,” or just feeling our way? The Modern Language Journal, 103(2), 516-527.
  42. Qie, N., Rau, P.-L. P., Wang, L., & Ma, L. (2019). Is the Senpai–Kouhai relationship common across China, Korea, and Japan? Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal,47(1), 1-12.
  43. Ragins, B., & Kram, K. (2007). The handbook of mentoring at work. Sage.
  44. Rose, D. H., & Meyer, A. (2002). Teaching every student in the digital age: Universal design for learning. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
  45. Ryan, S., & Irie, K. (2014). Imagined and possible selves: Stories we tell ourselves about ourselves. In S. Mercer &M. Williams(Eds.), Multiple perspectives on the self in SLA. Multilingual Matters.
  46. Sade, L. A. (2011). Emerging selves, language learning and motivation through the lens of chaos. Identity, Motivation and Autonomy in Language Learning, 54, 42-56.
  47. Stack, S. (2015). Learning outcomes in an online vs traditional course. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 9(1), Article 5.
  48. Tominaga, A., & Kogo, C. (2018). Attributes of good E-learning mentors according to learners. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 6(8), 1777-1783.
  49. Van Deursen, A. J., & Van Dijk, J. A. (2019). The first-level digital divide shifts from inequalities in physical access to inequalities in material access. New Media &Society, 21(2), 354-375.
  50. Vuorela, M., & Nummenmaa, L. (2004). Experienced emotions, emotion regulation and student activity in a web-based learning environment. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 19(4), 423-436.
  51. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning as a social system. Systems Thinker, 9(5), 2-3.
  52. Wenger, E. (2011). Communities of practice: A brief introduction. National Science Foundation.
  53. Xu, D., & Jaggars, S. S. (2014). Performance gaps between online and face-to-face courses: Differences across types of students and academic subject areas. The Journal of Higher Education, 85(5), 633-659.

[email protected]

Follow us @