Surface V. Depth: Maximising The Efficacy of Cohort-Based Learning in Challenging Times

Book: Implementing Transformative Student-Centered Pedagogies in the Neoliberal Academy: Constraints and Opportunities by CSMFL Publications

Kathleen Manion1 , Susanne Green2
1Royal Roads University, Canada; 2Royal Roads University, Canada.

10.46679/9789349926912ch08
This chapter is a part of: Implementing Transformative Student-Centered Pedagogies in the Neoliberal Academy: Constraints and Opportunities
ISBN (Ebook): 978-93-49926-91-2
ISBN (Hardcover Print): 978-93-49926-11-0
ISBN (Softcover Print): 978-93-49926-31-8

© CSMFL Publications & its authors.
Published: May 05, 2026

Manion, K. & Green, S. (2026). Surface V. Depth: Maximising The Efficacy of Cohort-Based Learning in Challenging Times. In F. Fovet, Implementing Transformative Student-Centered Pedagogies in the Neoliberal Academy: Constraints and Opportunities (pp 187-206). CSMFL Publications. https://dx.doi.org/10.46679/9789349926912ch08

Abstract

Intentional student-centred cohort-based models of education are embedded in various silos across higher education. This chapter summarises the literature on these models before plunging into findings from a mixed-methods study that one Canadian university undertook to examine its cohort-based model to redress challenges and identify approaches to maximise its benefits. Facilitating cohort-based models requires significant time and resources from both the instructor and the academic institution. It can be offered at either a surface level or with more depth and intention. Without engaging in ample preparation, employing targeted resources, and utilizing ongoing support to uphold a cohort-based model, the learning experience can be undermined and risky. Taking a deep dive, this chapter delves into the micro, meso, and macro-level tensions educational practitioners experience in exercising effective and equitable practice regarding cohort-based methods, and the sacrifices they make to comply with the shifting realities of contemporary higher education under neoliberal constraints.

Keywords: Cohort-based Learning, Student-Centred Education, Higher Education Pedagogy, Neoliberalism in Higher Education, Educational Equity, Instructional Resources, Mixed-Methods Research

References

  1. Adams, M., Blumenfeld, W.J., Chase, D., Catalo, J., Dejong, K.S., Hackman, H.W., Hopkins, L.E., Love, B.J., Peters, M.L., Schlasko, D., M.L., & Zuniga, X. (2018). Section 1: Getting Started: Core Concepts for Social Justice Education, pp. 1-64, Readings for Diversity and Social Justice (4th Edition). Routledge.
  2. Brabazon, H. (2021, Spring). The academy’s neoliberal response to COVID-19: Why faculty should be wary and how we can push back. Academic Matters: OCUFA’s Journal of Higher Education. https://academicmatters.ca/the-academys-neoliberal-response-to-covid-19-why-faculty-should-be-wary-and-how-we-can-push-back/
  3. Brenner, N., Peck, J., & Theodore, N. (2010). Variegated neoliberalization: Geographies, modalities, pathways. Global Networks, 10, 182–222. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0374.2009.00277.x
  4. Cao, S. L. C., & Behjat, L. (2021, July). Optimized Cohort Creation for Hybrid Online Design-learning During COVID-19. Paper presented at 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access, Virtual Conference. https://peer.asee.org/37548
  5. del Cerro Santamaría, G. (2019). A Critique of Neoliberalism in Higher Education. Oxford Education. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190264093.013.992
  6. Dewey, J (1963). Experience and Education. Collier Books.
  7. Desierto, A. & de Maio, C. (2020). The impact of neoliberalism on academics and students in higher education: A call to adopt alternative philosophies. Journal of Academic Language & Learning, 14(2), 148-159. ISSN 1835-5196
  8. Dyson, L., & Hanley, B. (2002). Testing the effect of a cohort grouping model as a form of instruction grouping in teacher education. The Canadian Journal of Higher Education, 32(2), 27-46. https://doi.org/10.47678/cjhe.v32i2.183410
  9. Fenning, K. (2004). Cohort-based learning: Application to learning organizations and student academic success. College Quarterly, 7(1), 1-11.
  10. Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. Continuum.
  11. Giannakakis, V. (2020). Neoliberalism and culture in higher education: on the loss of the humanistic character of the university and the possibility of its reconstitution. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 39(4), 365–382. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-019-09682-z
  12. Giroux, H. A. (2020). Neoliberalism’s war on higher education (2nd edition). Haymarket Books.
  13. Gordon, M. (2008). Between constructivism and connectedness. Journal of Teacher Education, 59(4), 322-331. https://doi.org/10.1177/00224871083213
  14. Hamann, E.T., & Wunder, S. (2013). Using a cohort approach to convert EdD students into critical friends. In V.A. Storey (Ed.), Redesigning Professional Education Doctorates: Application of Critical Friendship Theory to the EdD, 161-176.
  15. Hamiliton, D., Grundy, S., & Veletsianos, G. (2017). Introduction. In S. Grundy, D. Hamilton, G. Veletsianos, N. Agger-Gupta, P. Márquez, V. Forssman & M. Legault. (Eds.). Engaging Students in Life-Changing Learning. https://learningandteachingmodel.pressbooks.com/
  16. Hubbell, L., & Hubbell, K. (2010). When a college class becomes a mob: coping with student cohorts. College Student Journal, 44(2), 340+.
  17. Kolb, D. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Prentice-Hall.
  18. Ladson-Billings, G. (2014). Culturally Relevant Pedagogy 2.0: a.k.a. the Remix, Harvard Educational Review; Spring (2014) 84. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.84.1.p2rj131485484751
  19. McCarthy, J., Trenga, M.E., & Weiner, B. (2005). The cohort model with graduate student learners: Faculty-student perspectives. American Association for Adult and Continuing Education, 16(3-4). https://doi.org/10.1177/104515950501600305
  20. Maher, M.A. (2005). The evolving meaning and influence of cohort membership. Innovative Higher Education, 30, 195–21.
  21. Mandzuk, D., Hasinoff, S., Seifert, K. (2003). Inside a student cohort: Teacher education from a social capital perspective. Canadian Journal of Education, 28(1&2), 168-184. DOI: 10.2307/1602159
  22. Manion, K. Dyck, T., Shah-Preusser, N. & Thackeray, S. (2020). Teaching Innovation through team and collaborative based learning. In S. Palahicky (Ed). Enhancing Learning Design for Innovative Teaching in Higher Education. IGI Global. 10.4018/978-1-7998-2943-0.ch003
  23. Manion, K. & Green, S. (2025). Understanding and Maximizing Cohort Learning [Report]. Royal Roads University.
  24. Mercer-Mapstone, L., Dvorakova, S.L., Matthews, K.E., Abbot, S., Cheng, B., Felten, P., Knorr, K., Marquis, E., Shammas, R & Swaim, K. (2017). A systemic review of students as partners in higher education. International Journal for Students as Partners, 1(10), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v1i1.3119
  25. Oldham, T. (2017). The Impact of a Cohort-Based Learning Model on Student Success within Vocational Technical Certificates at a Community College [Doctoral Thesis]. College of Professional Studies, Northeastern University.
  26. Opacich. K.J. (2019). A cohort model and high impact practices in undergraduate public health education. Front Public Health, 7(132), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2019.00132
  27. Perkins, J. (2020). Millennial Experiences in Cohort-Based Higher Education Programs [Doctoral Dissertation, University of Hartford]. ProQuest Dissertations Publishing
  28. Portelli, J. P., & Konecny, C. P. (2013). Neoliberalism, subversion and democracy in education. Encounters on Education, 14, 87–97. https://doi.org/10.24908/eoe-ese-rse.v14i0.5044
  29. Power, M.J., O’ Flynn, M., Courtois, A., & Kennedy, M. (2013). Neoliberal Capitalism and Education in Ireland. In Immiseration Capitalism, Activism and Education: Resistance, Revolt and Revenge Institute of Education Policy Studies. Institute for Education Policy Studies.
  30. Rausch, D.W. & Crawford. E. (2020). Building the Future with Cohorts: Communities of Inquiry. Paper to be presented at the 2020 International Conference on Education and Social Science.
  31. Reason, P. and Bradbury, H. (2008). The SAGE handbook of action research: Participative inquiry and practice (2nd edition). SAGE.
  32. Saunders, D. (2007). The Impact of Neoliberalism on College Students. Journal of College and Character, 8(5). DOI: 10.2202/1940-1639.1620
  33. Thevathayan, C. (2018). Evolving Project based Learning to Suit Diverse Student Cohorts. EASE’18: Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering 2018. https://doi.org/10.1145/3210459.3210472
  34. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO). (2012). Education for sustainable development. http://www.unesco.org/new/en/education/themes/leading-the-international-agenda/education-for-sustainable-development/
  35. Urciuoli, B. (2012). Chapter 10. Neoliberal Education. In C. Greenhouse (Ed.), Ethnographies of Neoliberalism (pp. 162-176). University of Pennsylvania Press. https://doi.org/10.9783/9780812200010.162
  36. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society: the Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvjf9vz4
  37. Watts, J. (2013). Why hyperbonding occurs in the learning community classroom and what to do about it. Learning Communities Research and Practice, 1(3), Article 4.

This book is available worldwide via EBSCOhost Academic Collection, EBSCO E- books, Google Play Books, Amazon, World Cat Discovery Service/OCLC, CSMFL Bookstore, and 200+ book resellers and academic content vendors.

Statement on Publication Ethics

We, at CSMFL Publications, are committed to ensure the unbiased and transparent publishing, and upholding the high standards of editorial integrity in our publications. To know more, please read our Statement on Publication Ethics, Editorial Integrity & Misconduct

[email protected]

Follow us @